Why Indonesia Doesn’t Choose Sides

Jakarta is pursuing what it characterizes as “strategic equidistance” between China and the U.S.

|March 9, 2018

By Phillip Orchard

Australia put a long-running dispute with East Timor to rest last week when the pair signed a landmark maritime boundary agreement that will substantially boost Timorese control over oil and gas deposits in the Timor Sea. By doing so, however, Canberra may be reopening an old wound with its more important yet leery neighbor to the north, Indonesia. In response to the deal, Jakarta announced that it intends to revisit its own sea borders treaty with Australia that it reached in 1997 before East Timor seceded from Indonesia. The treaty was never ratified, partly because it failed to give equitable control over seabed resources in accordance with international maritime law. The Timor-Australia deal merely underscores the treaty’s disparities.

Still, the border dispute is bound to be an issue, even if it’s only a mild one, in a country as geographically fractured and as politically variegated as Indonesia, whose social, cultural and physical cleavages will prev

Get full access now:

Download as PDF or get access to all In-Depth Content

Over 10,000 Premium Readers

Download the article PDF format, full-color
$9.99
One Month Introductory Offer One month for $9.99, then $39 quarterly
$9.99
Subscribe
3 Months Introductory Offer Three months for $29, then $35 quarterly
$29
Subscribe
Why Indonesia Doesn’t Choose Sides

Reader feedback

“I want to thank you for all your writing. Your look at history--causes, motivations, effects--is so astounding against the mainstream dates, events, and bias. I read as much of your site as I can, but I most of all love the look at history. Nobody has as profound a look at American & European history, or WWII. You are peerless.” Christopher T. of Raleigh, NC
“The material is always well-written, and is very useful for understanding the significance of important issues developing across the world.” Beckett T. of Washington
“Geopolitical Futures' insights are mind-blowing. Their analyses never fail to distill order from the jumble of current events. No other publication comes close to the caliber of Geopolitical Futures' forecasts.” Bill S. of California
“Your emails is my best link to understanding what is going on in the world's hot spots without the extreme typical media bias. Keep up the great work. Thanks for your considerable efforts.” David H.
“Geopolitical Futures is unparalleled for open source analysis. It's like they have a crystal ball. I'm jealous of George Friedman's ability to effectively communicate such a complex world in such relatively simple terms. I'd pay far more money than I am now to keep this service. I feel like I'm stealing.” Dominic F. of Virginia
“Your analysis is thought-provoking and informative. I am a geopolitical hobbyist, but I also use your information to manage my retirement portfolio. I love your cogent, dispassionate analysis. Kudos to you.” Kevin A of Maryland
“I was an Economist subscriber. No longer. I find your articles insightful, easy to read, and only takes few minutes a day to stay informed. Bravo!” Pat G.
“The best analysis out there, by far. As a geopolitical analyst, you guys are an inspiration, a reference and a constant motivation for improvement. Thanks for the rigour and the high quality you deliver in all of your work!” Ricky M. of Panama
“I think you doing an excellent job keeping people informed about global trends. You are doing analysis in a timely manner for events across the globe which is challenging task. Keep up the good work!” Nicolae C. of Romania
“The insights that you offer often go against "conventional wisdom" and conformist views. However, more often than not, your profound assessments and forecasts, which stem from a deep understanding of a wide range of associated dynamics, have turned out to be correct with passage of time. It is for these reasons that I invest in your work.” K Singh of India
“One of the vanishingly few analysis publishers that try to understand the current situation in light of local, regional and international facts and historical events, with no discernible bias, a transparent effort to overcome cognitive bias, and refreshing willingness to go against the current when seeking to shed light on events.” Ian W. of Paraguay

Get full access now:

Download as PDF or get access to all In-Depth Content

Over 10,000 Premium Readers

Download the article PDF format, full-color
$9.99
One Month Introductory Offer One month for $9.99, then $39 quarterly
$9.99
Subscribe
3 Months Introductory Offer Three months for $29, then $35 quarterly
$29
Subscribe
Why Indonesia Doesn’t Choose Sides